Sunday, July 27, 2014

אלו ואלו דברי אלוקים חיים : Absurdity


"These and these are both the words of the Living G-d".

Warning: My Editor tells me that this post is way too technical.  Maybe so, but I'm just a beginner, so please have patience with me.



Torah

In attempting to determine how to implement Torah in our daily lives, the Sages of the Talmud often had different opinions and perspectives. Many times, these views were incompatible.


My Artscroll Gemara Gittin

In the Gemora in Gittin (6B) we find the following:


"Rav Evyasar met up with Eliyahu Hanavi and asked him what Hashem is doing right now. Eliyahu answered that Hashem is learning the Sugya (Talmudic discussion) of Pilegesh Begiv'a (a section of the Book of Judges), and He is saying, 'Evyasar my son says like this, Yonasan my son says like this.' He asked, 'are there uncertainties in heaven'? Eliyahu replied, 'Eilu veEilu Divrei Elokim Chaim'."

(A little background: The Gemora at this point is trying to establish the credentials of Rav Evyasar in an halachic dispute about gittin (divorce documents).   Rav Evyasar comes across Eluyahu HaNavi (Hey, Eli!  Wha'sup?), who informs him that in Heaven, the Ruler of the Universe supports both his answer and Rav Yonasan's.  Thus, Rav Evyasar is established as one of HaShem's beloved.)

Our point is that even in Shamayim, both opinions are true.  How can that be?

Imagine that.  Asks Rav Evyasar: The Holy One, Blessed be He, is sitting on His throne, and can't make up His mind?

The answer: well, as the Gemora continues, they are indeed both right.

Here's another one, from Eruvin, involving one of the famous disputes between Hillel and Shammai:

Eruvin 13a – R. Abba stated in the name of Shmuel: For three years there was a dispute between Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel, the former asserting, ‘The halachah is in agreement with our views’ and the latter contending, ‘The halachah is in agreement with our views’. Then a bas kol [a Message from Heaven] issued forth, announcing, ‘These and these are [both] the words of the living G-d, but the halachah is in agreement with the rulings of Beit Hillel’.
In this instance, although both are correct, the decision we are to follow is that of Beit Hillel.  Is this to say that Shammai is wrong? No.  But given the current state of the human predicament, Hillel's is the opinion to follow.  

The Burning Bush
The existence of opposite and true things is inherent in these discussions.  As I stated in my first blog, it is my view that this situation - what I am calling absurdity - is inherently built into the structure of the universe.  On purpose.  By G-d.  To quote from someone named Yonasan Moshe ben Avraham (from Minneapolis.  I saw this on the web), "HaShem built a universe in which even mistakes can be true."

There are lots of other examples:  the burning bush - which burns but is not consumed; the plague of Hail - water (ice) that burned with fire; the prayer of Asher Yatzar (said on leaving the bathroom) which praises G-d for the absurd impossibility of placing a spiritual soul in a physical body; the song Lecha Dodi (sung on Friday night) which states that G-d said two words (Shomer - keep Shabbat, and Zachor - Remember Shabbat) in one utterance.


Science

As is often the case, the Torah and the wisdom of our Sages regularly reflects understandings that, although they predate Science - are independently reaffirmed by the scientific process.

To wit:  is light a particle or a wave?  The following is from Wikipedia:

"The idea of duality originated in a debate over the nature of light and matter that dates back to the 17th century, when Christiaan Huygens and Isaac Newton proposed competing theories of light.


Wave–particle duality is a theory that proposes that every elementary particle exhibits the properties of not only particles, but also waves. A central concept of quantum mechanics, this duality addresses the inability of the classical concepts "particle" or "wave" to fully describe the behavior of quantum-scale objects. As Einstein described: "It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do"."

Humor

Probably my favorite exposition of the concept of inherent absurdity can be found in an article entitled "Humor as a Spiritual Experience", by Morty Tennenbaum - a fellow "Baltimoron" - which appeared in the journal Introspection, Number 2, 5764 (2003-2004).
To Morty, "humor consists of a harmonious synthesis of misfits.  The unique humorous component of the fusion is that these two concepts don't fit together and yet for one momentous instant they do!"
peekaboo !

Morty is a comic genius.  To illustrate his point, he uses the example of the children's game Peekaboo.  We all know the game.  One moment you're here, the next moment you're not, and then you're back again.  Why is this so funny?  According to Morty, "Our game consists of two parts.  Part one: "Where did Mommy go?".  Part two: "Here's Mommy!".  Each one of these are equally valid states" and "independently self consistent".  "Peekaboo forms a construct which at once both exists and does not exist."  "Humor...consists of the concept of 'It isn't.  But it is!'."


Redemption

To me, the implication of Morty's article is that G-d has set up the world to be a cosmic game of peekaboo with Him.  He is here, but He is not here.  He will hide Himself from us, but if we search for Him hard enough, we will find Him.  "I will conceal My face from them..." (Devarim 31:18), yet "from there you will seek HaShem and you will find him, if you search for Him with all your heart and all your soul" (Devarim 4:29).

The Beit HaMikdash - The Holy Temple
We find ourselves in the midst of the Three Weeks, and almost within the Nine Days leading up to Tisha B'Av, our national day of mourning.  

During this period, disasters befell us when HaShem hid His face from us.  Yet, the Maggid of Meziritch teaches us that this period is a time when HaShem is closest to us.  How can that be?  How can He be both Closest and Most Distant simultaneously?  According to the Maggid, during this period He comes to us.  Using a parable, the Maggid describes a King, who leaves his palace once a year to walk among the people.  During the year, the King is surrounded by guards and courtiers.  It's tough to get an appointment.  But at this time, any Tuvia, Dudu, or Chaim can just walk up to the King on the street and talk to him.  He comes to suffer with us in our exile.
I, for one, have a few choice thoughts to share with HaKodesh Baruch Hu on his annual tour.  I am looking forward to the end of our game of peekaboo.  The absurd may be a function of the nature of the universe, both spiritual and physical, as He created it.  It may even be the source of the humor that helps us to reconcile and get strength from the absurdity itself.  Despite all that, I'm a little tired, and I think I'm kind of old for this.  Especially when peekaboo becomes a game of Russian roulette using missiles.

Or is it just me?






3 comments:

  1. It's just you. I know because I feel the exact same way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We just had a discussion about some of rhis in shiur today. I think you were absent and missed my presentation on Quantum Torah

    ReplyDelete